About Me

Name: Benyamin Solomon
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Refuting Alex Constantine Again Part II

By Benyamin Solomon
I just finished part I of my third response to Alex Constantine. Now, I will focus on Alex's other points
For here's extra information.
Alex Constantine claims to have been tortured by the America government Alex said:
For five years I have been the victim of a formal torture program at the hands of the CIA. The torture is electromagnetic and difficult to trace, retaliation for my political research. . . . I have been subjected to a gruelling daily regimen of torture rendered from a remote source. I have been burned by microwaves, kept awake for days at a stretch by shrieking noises in my ears, the effect of pulsed audiograms. One evening I was hit by an infra-sound attack . . . on my spine, the most painful experience of my life. I was left crawling and screaming across the floor. For die-hard skeptics, I can offer this proof: Two of the leading child psychologists in the country once witnessed magnets repelled from my cranium. When I wrote a letter to Amnesty International about my plight (it was ignored), friends of mind [sic] were subjected to microwave attack. . . .
Someone who saw Alex make that claim said that he's simply a kook. He's worse than "Prophet Yahweh," who claims to be able to summon UFOs through reciting verses in the Hebrew bible. They both make up stories and make false unsupported bizarre claims.
According to a former associate of Alex Constantine, he is a kook who took a lot of drugs. His former associate said:
More stuff on Dan Rightmyer - the kook known as pen name Alex Constantine 
[ This is a repost of the following article:                               ] 
[ From: "MC" <mcan...@instanet.com>                                        ] 
[ Subject: Dan, Dan the ACID man                                           ] 
[ Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy                                 ] 
[ Message-ID: <7cdhte$l4...@remarQ.com>                                    ] 
I've responded adequately to Dan Rightmyer and his silly billy pal Brian in 
another recent thread. But there is something else you good folks really 
ought to know about Dan "Alex ConstantWhine" Rightmyer. 
(Sung to the tune of the "Beverly Hillbillies" theme...) 
Come and listen to my story 'bout a nut named Dan 
Hears voices in his head he says are from "The Man." 
He says "They filled my noggin full of electronic bugs!" 
But he doesn't let you know that he's done a lot of DRUGS. 
(ACID, that is. LSD. "Hundreds of trips.") 
"Hundreds of acid trips" is the admission Dan made to his former best 
friend, S.M. Any reasonable person who wants the full story should feel free 
to write me or call me. I'll tell ya how to talk to this former best friend 
for yourself -- you'll hear all sorts of outrageous, hilarious stories about 
Dan's history of massive drug abuse, as well his insane behavior. 
(Here's a sample: Once, one of Dan's inner "tormentors" identified himself 
by name. Dan found that a gentleman of this name was listed in the phone 
book. Dan, who owned a firearm, thretened to go to the house of this 
obviously-innocent party and shoot him!) *
"Alex" believes his opponents are fascist and/or CIA agents. Alexconstantine.com said:
Adding insult to injury, unthinking critics have made fun of Alex’s suffering. One of these is a former associate of Alex’s named Martin Cannon. [Is Cannon a CIA agent?]
The answer is no. He's not a CIA agent. He is simply challenging Alex, which is what gets "Alex" and/or his supporters call them CIA agents and/or fascists. 
"Alex" is a leading member of the 9/11 ''truth'' movement, which spreads the false conspiracy theory that it was the American government that committed the 9/11 attacks. 
Right after the title part "Resisting Islamo-fascism Awareness Week," it says to " confront the Horowitz fascists." This is a classic example of "Alex's'' blog post here falsely labeling his opponent fascist without any evidence. To be fair, it was an article that Alex cut and pasted on to his blog. Horowitz and his supporters are not fascist. They seek to expose Islamo-fascism and leftist denial of this threat. In "Alex's" article, I had a search of fascist up. It appears 22 times. The article said:
This October 22-26, America’s fascists will attempt to make a further major step in this repressive process. They have declared an “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” They are planning programs and protests at over 100 campuses, supposedly against the oppression of women under Islam and “the threat posed by the Islamic crusade against the West.” In fact, their aim is to rally people behind the U.S. “crusade” against the people of the world and to shut down dissent against this crusade on the campus and, by extension, more broadly throughout society.
"Alex's" blog here again, calls his opponents fascist without giving any evidence. Islamo-fascism awareness Week was not organized by fascists. It's an anti-fascist campaign. It exposes Islamo-fascism and leftist denial about the Islamist threat. Islamo-fascism Awareness Week seeks to spread the basic ideas of freedom and democracy into the Middle East and to stop Islamist infiltration of the world. It seeks to fight Islamist influence on campus and bring out the pro-American, pro-Israel and conservative viewpoints.
It seeks to protect both Muslims and non-Muslims alike from Islamo-fascism. Islamo-fascism Awareness Weak should be praised.
"Alex" said:
Horowitz is threatening to go after “the anti-American curriculum of the tenured left” and to “teach an alternative curriculum that will arm America against the radical Jihad.” In fact, Horowitz has already led attacks on professors like Ward Churchill, known mainly for his work on exposing the U.S. genocide against Native Americans, and Norman Finkelstein, known mainly for his exposure of Israel’s crimes and its hypocritical use of the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews to justify those crimes.
Both Ward Churchill and Norman Finklestein are terrorist supporters. This is a storng label. But it is true. 
Ward Churchill compares 9/11 victims to Nazis. Churchill actually supports the 9/11 attacks, while most the world condemned this barberic terrorist attack on our great nation. Churchill said in his essay:

 There is simply no argument to be made that the Pentagon personnel killed on September 11 fill that bill. The building and those inside comprised military targets, pure and simple. As to those in the World Trade Center . . . 
 
 Well, really. Let's get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. They formed a technocratic corps at the very heart of America's global financial empire – the "mighty engine of profit" to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved – and they did so both willingly and knowingly. Recourse to "ignorance" – a derivative, after all, of the word "ignore" – counts as less than an excuse among this relatively well-educated elite. To the extent that any of them were unaware of the costs and consequences to others of what they were involved in – and in many cases excelling at – it was because of their absolute refusal to see. More likely, it was because they were too busy braying, incessantly and self-importantly, into their cell phones, arranging power lunches and stock transactions, each of which translated, conveniently out of sight, mind and smelling distance, into the starved and rotting flesh of infants. If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it. 



Decent people found this horrible abhorrent remark to be offensive [especially the part where Ward Churchill calls 9/11 victims "little Eichmmann"] . Churchill compared more than three thousands innocent people in this great nation America, who were killed by Al Quada barbarians for being "infidels," to Nazis.
Who's Norman Finklestein. He's publicly a supporter of Hezbollah, which killed the most Americans before Al Quada. The 9/11 commission found that Hezobllah and Iran have ties to Al Quada. Hezbollah seeks the destruction of the state of Israel and the creation of an expansionist Islamist state in Lebanon. Finklestein said in the Lebanese TV station Future TV:
I was of course happy to meet the Hezbollah people because it is point of view rearly heard in the United States. And I have no problem saying that I do want to express solidarity with them, and I'm not going to be a coward and a hypocrite about it.
Mr. Finklestein goes on saying that he doesn't know nor does he care about Hezbollah as a political organization. Mr. Finklestein, Hezbollah's vision of Lebanon is anti-democratic and is the same expansionist Islamist state as Iran. He rudely disrupts and shouts at his interviewer, who doesn't come out in favor of Hezbollah [though I disagree with her with what Hezbollah was in 2000 for I consider Hezbollah as a radical Islamist terrorist organization since its founding by the terrorist regime in Iran]. Hezbollah used terrorism on innocent civilians since day one.  Finkelstein said that "there is no question among rational people that Israel was never going to let the Hezbollah victory go by.''
That's correct Norman because a Hezbollah victory includes the elimination of Israel and the Islamization of Lebanon and the rest of the world. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said:
But world opinion should know that Islamic conquest is not the same as conquests by other rulers of the world.... [Non-Islamic] conquerors want to rule the world so that they 
can spread through it every injustice and sexual indecency, whereas Islam wants to conquer the world in order to promote spiritual values, and to prepare mankind for 
justice and Divine rule..


Finklestein said:
If Hezbollah laid down its arms, and said,"We will do whatever the Americans say," you wouldn't have a war, that's true, but you would also be the slaves of the Americans. I have to respect those who refuse to be slaves.

Finklestein said that there is no other way than military resistance unless the Lebanese [Finklestein said many Lebanese chose to be "their" slaves] chose to be slaves. That's the biggest piece of garbage there is. Neither America nor Israel want to enslave Lebanon. If Hezbollah disarms like what America, Israel, the UN and the international community call it to do, then the Lebanese people wouldn't be slaves of America or Israel. It would help bring peace to Israel and Lebanon. Hezbollah wanted the Lebanese people to be "slaves" of the Syrian occupiers, Finklestein. 
Unlike Israel and America, Syria refuses to recognize Lebanon's right to exist and occupied Lebanon, even controlling their political system, until 2005 [though Israel did occupy southern lebanon from 1978-2000 and the rest of Lebanon from 1982-1983, it wasn't to control Lebanon but to fight the terrorists in Lebanon who targeted Israeli civilians and fought to eliminate Israel]. Syria considers Lebanon as part of "greater Syria." Israel, on the other hand, doesn't want to control Lebanon and seeks to eliminate the terrorist threat from Lebanon.  When Syria occupied Lebanon, Hezbollah wasn't resisting Syria. Syria has [even when it was occupying Lebanon] gave their support to Hezbollah to unite against Israel and America. Finklestein, the anti-Israel and anti-American propagandist, even expressed bigotry against Arabs. Finklestein said:
You have no self-respect. How can you expect other people to respect Arabs, if you show no respect for yourselves.
Before he made that bigoted remark on Arabs, he falsely accused President Bush of destroying Lebanon and said that he should be declared persona non-grata there. Finklestein has this close-minded pro-Hezbollah mentality that if any Lebanese doesn't fight alongside Hezbollah terrorists, starting wars on Israel, then he/she would rather be a slave. As I pointed out:
 A. the Hezobllah embraced the Syrian occupiers. 
B. the Lebanese people especially the Christians, don't want to live under the Islamist state that Hezbollah is fighting for.
 Most Lebanese oppose Hezbollah and want peace with Israel and to return to the time before the Lebanese civil war, when Lebanon was a free democracy, in which Christians and Muslims coexisted, and when Lebanon's capital Beirut was known as "the Paris of the Middle East." Hezbollah is a major obstacle to that vision and opposes it. Most Lebanese don't want to start wars with Israel. That doesn't make them "slaves" or having "no self-respect." That just means they don't want to live under hezbollah's Islamo-fascist vision and that they don't want to start wars with or commit terrorist attacks on Israel. They don't seek to destroy Israel.
It's many Lebanese Christians, not Hezobllah, that fights for the freedom of Lebanon from bloodshed and wars. The Lebanese Christians don't want to be second-class dhimmis as they would be in the state Hezbollah and other Islamists fight for.
Most Lebanese understand that it was Hezbollah that started the war and dislike Hezbollah for that. Almost all Lebanese Christians oppose Hezbollah and its terrorist war on Israel. Even most Lebanese Sunnis and many Shiites oppose Hezbollah's terrorist attack and blame Hezobllah for provoking Israel to attack Lebanon [Hezbollah used  Lebanese civilians as human shields, while Israel only targeted Hezbollah, so when Israel strikes Hezbollah, it would hit civilians and would be a propaganda war on Israel]. The Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood is the only Sunni [the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood, along with the rest of the Muslim Brotherhood, is a radical Islamist organization] organization that supports and fought alongside Hezbollah against Israel in the July 2006 war on Israel. "Contrary to Western press reports, indicating high percentages of Christian support for Hezbollah, 90 percent of Christians, 80 percent of Sunni and 40 percent of Shiites in Lebanon oppose Hezbollah," said Sami El-Khoury who's president of the World Maronite Union.

After being attacked by Hezbollah supporters, many Lebanese said that they like Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert more than they like Hezbollah leader Hasan Narallah, who they spoke out against. Hasan Narallah said,"If the Jews gather in Israel, it would save us the trouble of going after them worldwide."
Amal Saad-Ghorayab even exposes Hezbollah as an anti-Semitic organization. On Al-Manur TV, Hezbollah's TV station, they present the blood-libel, the notorious anti-Semitic hoax made up in medival Christian Europe, as a fact.
Norman Finklestein supports Al Quada. He said:
Frankly, part of me says - even though everything since September 11 has been a nightmare--'you know what, we deserve the problem on our hands because some things Bin Laden says are true'. One of the things he said on that last tape was that 'until we live in security, you're not going to live in security', and there is a certain amount of rightness in that. 
Norman Finkelstein also praised the notorious Holocaust denier David Irving. Anne Applebaum said:
And now it turns out that I am not the only one who has been quietly irritated by the museum's existence. Norman Finkelstein, a professor at Columbia University in New York, has just published a book whose title reflects something a bit more robust than quiet irritation: The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering.
In it, Finkelstein argues not only that the Washington Holocaust museum is inappropriate, but that the majority of people who now claim to be Holocaust survivors are fakes; that the American Jewish institutions dedicated to squeezing compensation from European governments and industries are keeping most of the money for themselves; that David Irving is a nauseating man but a good historian; that the insistence on the Holocaust's uniqueness has suppressed rational discussion of the history of the events themselves.
Finkelstein said:
But Irving, notorious as an admirer of Hitler and sympathizer of German National Socialism, has nevertheless, as Gordon Craig points out, made an "indispensible'' contribution to our knowledge of WWII.
Yet these are the two guys "Alex" defends. He, along with 
Finkelstein, accuse Israel of using the Holocaust as a cover for Israel's "crimes." It's funny of "Alex" to accuse Israel of using the Holocaust as a cover for its so-called "crimes" while Alex calls his opponents fascists and Nazis all the time.
"Alex" and Finkelstein, Israel is defending herself. In fact, Israel has a school that teaches its soldiers and trains them to follow international law  and go after the terrorists with causing the least amount of harm on Palestinian civilians as possible. Israel even sends humanitarian soldiers to help Palestinian civilians at checkpoints, which are meant to make it easier for Israel to stop terrorists. The purity of arms, a section in the IDF doctrine, said:
The IDF serviceman will use force of arms only for the purpose of subduing the enemy to the necessary extent and will limit his use of force so as to prevent unnecessary harm to human life and limb, dignity and property.
The IDF servicemen's purity of arms is their self-control in use of armed force. They will use their arms only for the purpose of achieving their mission, without inflicting unnecessary injury to human life or limb; dignity or property, of both soldiers and civilians, with special consideration for the defenseless, whether in wartime, or during routine security operations, or in the absence of combat, or times of peace.
The following is the IDF code of conduct:


    1. Military action can only be taken against military targets.
    2. The use of force must be proportional.
    3. Soldiers may only use weaponry they were issued by the IDF.
    4. Anyone who surrenders cannot be attacked.
    5. Only those who are properly trained can interrogate prisoners.
    6. Soldiers must accord dignity and respect to the Palestinian population and those arrested.
    7. Soldiers must give appropriate medical care, when conditions allow, to oneself and one's enemy.
    8. Pillaging is absolutely and totally illegal.
    9. Soldiers must show proper respect for religious and cultural sites and artifacts.
    10. Soldiers must protect international aid workers, including their property and vehicles.
    11. Soldiers must report all violations of this code.
Israel only targets terrorists. Israel wants peace and security, not more territory. The claim that Israel uses the holocaust as a cover is a claim commonly made by anti-Semites including holocaust deniers. Israel mourns the holocaust because it is the Jewish state,  which was founded to be a haven for the Jewish people [Israel's non-Jewish Arab minority have equal rights to Israeli Jews and more rights than Arabs in the Arabs and Muslims in the Arab [and Muslim] states including Iran and the Palestinian Authority].
In fact, the US asked the Israelis to translate its code of conduct  for US forces in Iraq. The Israelis did what the Americans asked for.

Alex also said in his article Resist Islamo-fascism Awareness Weak:
He [David Horowitz] is branding the Muslim Student Associations as “the enemy,” and is aiming to stir up hatred and suppression against these students. 
Alex, the Muslim Student Association [MSA] is part of the Muslim Brotherhood-led colition to Islamize America and the rest of the world. The 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memo lists that organization in the ''list of our organizations and the orgnaizations of our friends"  and calls for the following:
The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The 
Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and 
destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their 
hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious 
over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and 
have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work 
wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that 
destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be 
equal. 

The MSA was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood to Islamize America and the rest of the world and is part of the Muslim Brotherhood-led fascist nazified infiltration of this great nation America.

Ahmad Shama, then-president of the UCLA branch of the MSA, sponsored and spoke at a demonstration that called for the "Death to Israel," and "Death to Jews." MSA members also raised money for Hamas and Hezbollah. The MSA also organized  an event where the ambassador of the then ruling Taliban government was addressing the campus. The MSA, along with the Muslim Student Union, which is also part of the Muslim Brotherhood-led invasion of America, disrupted Daniel Pipes with calls to jihad.

Ahmad Shama also said, “We want to restore Islam to the leadership of society. … The goal … is the reestablishment of the Islamic form of government.” 

MSA and other groups in the radical Islamist Muslim Brotherhood-led invasion of America would pretend to be moderate and would sometimes sound moderate to the non-Islamic world. However, when speaking to the Muslim world, they would publicly state their radical Islamist goals. In fact, the PLO used the same tactic in the "recognition" of Israel's right to exist. When talking to the Arab and Muslim world, they would incite terrorism on and publicly call for Israel's elimination. They would even engage in terrorism with Israel. However, when talking to the west, the PLO would claim to recognize Israel's right to exist, condemn terrorism and call for peace with the Jewish state.

Yet, the "Alex" claims that David Horowitz is just spreading hatred against the MSA. "Alex," MSA is a real fascist Nazified enemy to America and its allies including Israel and to America's values such as freedom and democracy.

 Some people think I'm wasting my time responding to "Alex" and that he's not worth my time. I tell them that many people call "Alex" an investigative journalist. I'm debunking ''Alex'' and his supporters. My goal is to show the world that "Alex" is not an investigative journalist, not an expert on fascism, but a fringe conspiracy theorist who calls his opponents fascist and CIA agents without any evidence. No investigtive journalist would accuse me of calling liberals nazis or saying that I said the left is "a front for Nazis,'' as "Alex" did citing my article "Who are the Real Nazis," which accuses radical Islamists, not liberals, of being nazis. That article did not say that the left is a "front for Nazis." Anyone who reads that article can see that. Yet apparently, "Alex," the investigative journalist, couldn't.


To make things worse, "Alex" has a band named after him called the "Constantines." I'm only here to expose "Alex'' for what he is, a leftist propagandist, who calls his opponents fascists or CIA agents.


*See his post on googlegroups 


Benyamin Solomon's note: I cut and pasted this article onto my blog in order to save it. It's apparently being taken down by Newsflavor For now, it you click catched, you can only see the first page of it. I also did some editing to make this article better. The date here is the date when this article was  I posted it on my blog. The date of this article when published on Newsflavor was October 28, 2008.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I hate Hamas and Hezbollah

By Ijh, Bay Ridge talk
This is an excerpt today from an editorial from the New York Time by Jeffrey Goldberg. You can read the entire piece here
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/14/opinion/14goldberg-1.html?pagewanted=2&em

Another reality worth considering concerns theology. Hamas and Hezbollah emerged from very different streams of Islam: Hamas is the Palestinian branch of the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood; Hezbollah is an outright Iranian proxy that takes its inspiration from the radical Shiite politics of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. But the groups share a common belief that Jews are a cosmological evil, enemies of Islam since Muhammad sought refuge in Medina.

Periodically, advocates of negotiation suggest that the hostility toward Jews expressed by Hamas is somehow mutable. But in years of listening, I haven’t heard much to suggest that its anti-Semitism is insincere. Like Hezbollah, Hamas believes that God is opposed to a Jewish state in Palestine. Both groups are rhetorically pitiless, though, again, Hamas sometimes appears to follow the lead of Hezbollah.

I once asked Abdel Aziz Rantisi where he learned what he called “the truth” of the Holocaust — that it didn’t happen — and he referred me to books published by Hezbollah. Hamas and Hezbollah also share the view that the solution for Palestine lies in Europe. A spokesman for Hezbollah, Hassan Izzedine, once told me that the Jews who survive the Muslim “liberation” of Palestine “can go back to Germany, or wherever they came from.” He went on to argue that the Jews are a “curse to anyone who lives near them.”

Nizar Rayyan expressed much the same sentiment the night we spoke in 2006. We had been discussing a passage of the Koran that suggests that God turns a group of impious Jews into apes and pigs. The Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, among others, has deployed this passage in his speeches. Once, at a rally in Beirut, he said: “We shout in the face of the killers of prophets and the descendants of the apes and pigs: We hope we will not see you next year. The shout remains, ‘Death to Israel!’”

Mr. Rayyan said that, technically, Mr. Nasrallah was mistaken. “Allah changed disobedient Jews into apes and pigs, it is true, but he specifically said these apes and pigs did not have the ability to reproduce,” Mr. Rayyan said. “So it is not literally true that Jews today are descended from pigs and apes, but it is true that some of the ancestors of Jews were transformed into pigs and apes, and it is true that Allah continually makes the Jews pay for their crimes in many different ways. They are a cursed people.”

I asked him the question I always ask of Hamas leaders: Could you agree to anything more than a tactical cease-fire with Israel? I felt slightly ridiculous asking: A man who believes that God every now and again transforms Jews into pigs and apes might not be the most obvious candidate for peace talks at Camp David. Mr. Rayyan answered the question as I thought he would, saying that a long-term cease-fire would be unnecessary, because it will not take long for the forces of Islam to eradicate Israel.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mrislamanswersback Exposed and Refuted Part II

This is part II of  my refutation of this anti-American propagandist from youtube.


In part I of this article [also see here on my blog], I debunked his claim about these white anglo Americans and westerners who supposedly seek world domination. Mrislamanswersback complains about America and the west spreading democracy as part of a white-anglo western attempt to dominate the world. Mrislamanswersback said,"This has been the goal of the radical anglo European and American, to dominate the world. Make no mistakes about it.  This has been their goal. History proves it. And today, the obstacle that stands in the way of them achieving this goal is Islam and the Muslim people. This is why today, Islam is being demonized. This is why today, the Muslim areas are being targeted. This is why today they're trying to pass policies in order to promote some idea or force or impose the idea of a western-style democracy in the Middle East. You've continually heard them talk about democracy. They want to change it. They want to change it. They want to shape the Middle East. This is their goal. This is their goal-to dominate and they're the ones who are really trying to change the culture of the Middle East and other peoples around the face of the Earth. So make no mistake about it. The true peoples who's intent to control the world is them, not the Muslim[s]. It is they, the radical anglo American and European. These are the people, who's goal is global domination."

At the end of that video, they show the same clip of conspiracy theorist Antony J. Hidler. In the last article, I already showed some of the proof about the Islamist's goal of world domination and debunked the claim that these so-called radical anglo westerners seek world domination. Anyway, let's continue with ridiculous claims made by Mrislamanswersback. Here's some really amusing irony. Mrislamanswersbacksays his vidoes are a "Truth destroys Falsehood production," yet these articles will destroy Mrislamansersback's falsehoods. 

Mrislamanswersback, if these white anglo-Europeans and Americans seek world domination, then why do they want to spread democracy? With democracy, they can elect leaders who fight them. If they seek world domination, they would take it over [or possibly install puppet leaders], but they wouldn't seek to spread democracy.  Democracy is the best system. The Middle East is full of brutal totalitarian leaders. 

Mrislamanswersback and Walid Shoebat

   Walid Shoebat is a former PLO terrorist and now an evengelical christian and a supporter of Israel. As a secular Jew, I disagree with his Enengelical Christian positions. I disagree with what he says about Islam. Trying to "prove" that walid Shoebat is a fraud is an obsession of Mrislamanswersback. 

In this video [Walid Shoebat exposed and refuted 1 of 9], he claims that Sohebat is an alias, then contradicts himself with claiming that Walid Shoebat is not an alias and that it is just claimed by him that it is one. In the former video, Mrislamanswersback cites two articles where Shoebat's tour manager claims that he wants Shoebat to hide his armageddon christian evangelical beliefs, despite the fact that Shoebat's beliefs on that are well-known. According to those articles mentioned, Davies says that he want Shoebat to go aorund supposedly spreading anti-Muslim propaganda [despite the fact that Shoebat publicly hires Afghan Muslims] and not to tell anyone. It's suspicious why he would say these things, but fair enough. Mrislamanswersback does show the excerpts from the articles. They're meaningless. As stated, Shoebat is public with his  evangelical Christian beliefs and what he says about Islam, two of which I don't support. That doesn't prove that he's a fraud. Yes, I disagree with his evangelical Christian beliefs. But still, it doesn't prove that Shoebat is a fraud. Possibly [I'm not saying it's true], Davies could be using Shoebat, who believes these things and who actually was a former terrorist. This is inadequate evidence. Yet despite that even me [not associated with the Shoebat foundation] hears his evangelical beliefs and what he says on Islam, Mrislamanswersback claims that ''When shoebat goes out, he has to leave those parts out." 

Yet even before showing these two bunk sources [wasting the viewers time about Shoebat being an evangelical Christian when you could hear it just as easily off of him], Mrislamanswersback states:

Now, in dealing with Walid Shoebat, I've done some research and as far as I could find,  there is no proof that he was a former terrorist. There is no independent confirmation that this man was a terrorist. The only person who says he was a terrorist is himself or was a terrorist is himself. There is no independent proof outside of his own statements that he was part of the PLO or any other group that has been associated or alleged to be connected with terrorism. So based on that, we have to even question that right there. 

Mrislamanswersback has done some research and now manipulates his sources to "prove" him as a fraud or liar. Mrislamamanaswersback's "research" seems to exclude that Walid Shoebat showed hard evidence to Daniel Pipes about him being a Palestinian. As for being a terrorist, after seeing the documentation of him being from the territories, Daniel Pipes just trusted that he was a terrorist. Daniel Pipes said:

(1) Mr. Shoebat showed me a number of documents in several languages - official papers, newspaper clippings, and the like. I read them when he visited me but did not keep copies.
(2) He admits that he can document his life but not his having been a near-terrorist. He asks that that be taken on faith, given that the rest of his life is as he says it is. I see no reason to doubt him.

This is part of the proof that Mrislamanswersback's "research" is bunk. In part III, I will discuss more about Mrislamanswersback and his pathetic attempt to slander Mr. Shoebat. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MrIslamanswersback exposed and refuted part I

By Benyamin Solomon

MrIslamanswersback is a youtube user who tries to protray those who fight Islamism as racists against Arabs and Muslims. Part II to this is coming soon.

Though not an Islamist himself, Mrislamanswersback tries to make those who fight Islamists as bigots or "haters." He's in reality a conspiracy theorist. He hates America and Israel. He believes in the new world order conspiracy theory.

He is an African-American and a Christian, who converted to Islam. He tries to discredit former terrorist Walid Shoebat by cherrypicking the evidence.


Mr. Islamanswersbacks youtube profile picture.


Mr. Islamanswersback said,"If you want to challenge what I said and respond to what's in the video and provide evidence, but I don't see anybody doing that. Everybody's just making empty claims, a bunch of propaganda. But you're not refuting the points nor the evidence that I present. Do you know what? I'm not surprised because I know you can't respond to that. None of you have responded because I gave hard evidence. I gave the sources. I let you see the sources, the pages the books that I mentioned, the articles that I mentioned. I backed up everything I said with proof. So I'm not surprised you can't respond because the evidence is too strong for that. And we give praise to Allah for that."

But Mrislamanswersback should know that these article will challenge his points and will show that his "evidence" is cherrypicking sources to promote hatred toward America. 

The title of the video with Mrislamanswersback saying what I quoted him of saying is titled "A message to ignorant anti-Islamist bigots." 

First off, he should know it's better to say "A message to ignorant anti-Islamic bigots," though it would still make his claims just as ridiculous and keep the fact that he cherrypicks sources to further an anti-American agenda as well as to portray those who fight the threat of radical Islam as "haters." 

I'm no white supremacist. I'm not a bigot toward Arabs and Muslims, just a man of freedom out there to fight Islamism [not Islam] and to support Israel, America, the west and the rest of the free world.

New world Order: white anglos vs. Islamists

One video is "Oppression: Radical Anglo Amerikkka's hatred of Islam," which is about the those white anglo Christians supposedly seeking world domination. In that video, Mrislamanswersback starts off as saying,"As we have documented before that the goal of the radical angloAmerican  is world domination, American global leadership. In my other videos, I've showed you the documentation of the founding principles of the Project for New American century, which states that very clearly their goal is to promote American global leadership, okay i.e. anglo-radical anglo American global domination is their goal. You can see it's very clear in their foreign policies. You can see the father of Bush, back in September 11, 1991, he spoke very clearly about a new world order."

This documentation is cherry picking. If we mention the Islmaist's goals of world domination, we're haters as well as bigots and racists against Arabs and Muslims. While we see Islamists speak clearly of their goals of world Islamic domination, we have unnamed white anglos who seek world domination, ones who don't exist or have their words taken out of context by Mrislamanswersback's "strong evidence" or "documentation." 

Here's what Hassan Al-Banna said:

It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.

The NY Times article continued by saying:

That vision has inspired nearly every Muslim group formed since.

Muhammad Salah, a journalist who writes about Islamic movements in Egypt stated:

All fundamentalist groups have one goal: setting up an Islamic state with no borders.

Sayyid Qutb stated:

Islam knows only two kinds of societies, the Islamic and the jahili. The Islamic society is that which follows Islam in belief and ways of worship, in law and organization, in morals and manners. The jahili society is that which does not follow Islam and in which neither the Islamic belief and concepts, nor Islamic values or standards, Islamic laws and regulations, or Islamic morals and manners are cared for.

The Islamic society is not one in which people call themselves 'Muslims' but in which the Islamic law has no status, even though prayer, fasting and Hajj are regularly observed; and the Islamic society is not one in which people invent their own version of Islam, other than what God and His Messenger-peace be on him-have prescribed and explained, and call it, for example, 'progressive Islam'.

Jahili society appears in various forms, all of them ignorant of the Divine guidance. 

Qutb also stated:

But this is not the case with Islam, as Islam is the way of life ordained by God for all mankind, and this way establishes the Lordship of God alone-that is, the sovereignty of God - and orders practical life in all its daily details. Jihaad in Islam is simply a name for striving to make this system of life dominant in the world. As far as belief is concerned, it clearly depends upon personal opinion, under the protection of a general system in which all obstacles to freedom of personal belief have been removed. Clearly this is an entirely different matter and throws a completely new light on the Islamic Jihaad.

These appear in his famous book "Milestones," which can be viewed here.

Ayatollah Khomieni, the first Supreme leader of Iran, said,''Establishing the Islamic state world-wide belong to the great goals of the revolution.'' He also said, ''We will export our revolution throughout the world, and must abandon all idea of not doing so, for not only does Islam refuse to recognize any difference between Muslim countries, it is the champion of all oppressed people.' He also said, 'We are at war with infidels. Jihad must triumph.''
Mahmoud Ahamdinejad, President of Iran, threatens to wipe Israel off the map and denies the Holocaust happened. He hosted the event that called for a world without America and Zionism. He called on Islam to conquer the mountain tops of the world and said that the Iranian revolution is ''global.''

The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran calls for a "united single world community."

The current Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Khamenei called for "expanding religious rites and beliefs throughout the world."

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said:

There is no truth on earth but monotheism and following tenets of Islam and there is no way for salvation of mankind but rule of Islam over mankind

Binladin said:

I was ordered to fight the people until they say there is no god but Allah, and his prophet Muhammad.

These American white anglos don't seek world domination. America seeks to spread freedom and democracy around the world. MrIslamanswersback quotes project for a new American Century out of context. It's not calling for America to dominate the world, but for America to spread freedom and democracy. It rightly supports America as the new superpower and America's goal of spreading freedom and democracy. How does Mrislamanswersback know if there's any black people working for Project for a new American Century or not? The group also stated:

America’s strategic goal used to be 
containment of the Soviet Union; today the 
task is to preserve an international security 
environment conducive to American 
interests and ideals.  The military’s job 
during the Cold War was to deter Soviet 
expansionism.  Today its task is to secure 
and expand the “zones of democratic 
peace;” to deter the rise of a new great- 
power competitor; defend key regions of 
Europe, East Asia and the Middle East; and 
to preserve American preeminence through 
the coming transformation of war made possible by new technologies. 

 

It says that America's task is to promote democracy. And this group praises America for that. Mrislamanswersback joins the conspiracy theorists in saying that Bush Sr. called for world domination because he called for "a new world order." What he called for is an era of peace an freedom. It was after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and during the Madrid talks, when he tried to bring peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.  Mrislamanswersback has his own commentary when he called for the rule of law, with "who's law? The rule of the anglo saxon western mans law."

Mrislanaswersback also takes the infamous video of saying that:

 

There is a chance for the president of the United States to use this disaster to carry out what his father -a phrase his father used only once and hasn't been used since. And that is a new world order.

Yet he didn't mean world domination by America, like how Islamists seek world domination. He said in his book that a new world order [or "new twenty-first century order," which is the same thing] meant that nations cooperate to achieve their aims. Plus, he called neo-Conservatives "Nazis." Mrislamanswersback cites the History Channel documentary "New World Order" to "prove" that these anglos are out for world domination [we will speek more about it later in this series]. 

According to Mrislanaswersback, "Islam stands in the way of them achieving world domination. Therefore, Islam has been made the target. And this is expressed better than me by Antony J. Hilder."

It shows a short clip as saying that "Islam is bing targeted as the fall guys because they hate the Manhattan money monarchy, not because they hate the American people. Unfortunately, most Americans are just too d*mm dumb to recognize that they've been led by lambs to be slaughtered on the alter of the illumanazis, "new world order."

First off, Islamists make it clear that they hate infidels and seek to treat them as second-class citizens or to fight them until their backwards form of Islam is imposed on the whole world. We're not targeting Islam, just Islamism. The Islam we should promote is a democratic tolerant form of Islam. Binladin and Al Quada repeatedly "justified" the killing of American civilians. 9/11 showed that Islamists do hate the American people.

It quotes David Rockefeller as saying that Americans wll accept new world order if a crisis happens. It's not evidence that he's calling for world domination, but possibly to prevent terrorist attacks, as well as to spread freedom and democracy.

According to Mrislamanswersback, Islam is " a religion that teaches you to stand up against oppression, to challenge the mischief-makers and those who oppress people on the Earth unjustly. And it's no wonder. Look, They are the people who do those very same things. They have been and are continually  the people who continue to oppress people upon the face of the Earth, who set up systems of injustice, who perpetrate unjust wars against people for their own power and gain. So of course, they made Islam the target. Islam stands in the way because of its honorable teachings of fighting against oppression, against injustice and standing up for that, which is right and combating that which is wrong. So, wow. You should not be amazed that they made Islam the target. It stands in their way, as more people become Muslim, you see that their power will be challenged and they don't like that Antony J. Hilder makes it clearer."


Antony J. Hiler said,"This is a war against Islam. And Islam is an obstacle to world government. The Muslims have to be terminated. No, no, no, let's not get prejudice. Let be honest. Let's get friendly with these good people.'' But the president of the United States wants to terminate these people. Now it's time we get in bed with indivisuals who are seeking freedom against this oligarchy of evil, against this illuminazi elite, against those who are triyng to bring world government upon the ashes  of all national sovereignty. We must align. We mus thave a free world alliance to protect the linguistic religious, racial, political nation states that deserve to be free."

Being friendly with moderate Muslims of course is a good thing. No, President Bush doesn't seek to wipe out the Muslims or Islam. He seeks to strengthen a democratic tolerant form of Islam and to spread democracy into the Middle East. Antony J. Hilder is a notorious conspiracy theorist who believes in the new world order conspiracy theorist who believes in the new world order conspiracy theory and the illumati myth. he's not a credible source. 

In 6 of 9 of "Wald Shooebat: Exposed and refuted" Mrislamanswersback complains that some quotes by Islamists calling for world domination are taken out of context. Mrislamanswersback shows those videos and provides what the "full context" could be. It quotes that PA minister of religious affairs in the Fatah government in the PA Ibrhaim Mudeiris as calling for Islam to dominate the world. Ye the says as What could be the full context is that:

He could be saying that since so many people are converting to Islam that one day it be the dominant way.

yet when you see his sermon, you see that he doesn't talk about people converting to Islam as making Islam more dominant. Here's the full quote of what Ibrahim Mudeiris said:

Allah has tormented us with "the people most hostile to the believers" – the Jews. "Thou shalt find that the people most hostile to the believers to be the Jews and the polytheists." Allah warned His beloved Prophet Muhammad about the Jews, who had killed their prophets, forged their Torah, and sowed corruption throughout their history.
With the establishment of the state of Israel, the entire Islamic nation was lost, because Israel is a cancer spreading through the body of the Islamic nation, and because the Jews are a virus resembling AIDS, from which the entire world suffers.
You will find that the Jews were behind all the civil strife in this world. The Jews are behind the suffering of the nations.
Ask Britain what it did to the Jews in the early sixth century. What did they do to the Jews? They expelled them, tortured them, and prevented them from entering Britain for more than 300 years. All this was because of what the Jews did in Britain. Ask France what it did to the Jews. They tortured them, expelled them, and burned their Talmud, because of the civil strife the Jews wanted to spark in France, in the days of Louis XIX. Ask Portugal what it did to the Jews. Ask Czarists Russia, which welcomed the Jews, who plotted to kill the Czar - so he massacred them. But don't ask Germany what it did to the Jews. It was the Jews who provoked Nazism to wage war against the entire world, when the Jews, using the Zionist movement, got other countries to wage an economic war on Germany and to boycott German merchandise. They provoked Russia, Britain, France, and Italy. This enraged the Germans toward the Jews, leading to the events of those days, which the Jews commemorating today.
But they are committing worse deeds than those done to them in the Nazi war. Yes, perhaps some of them were killed and some burned, but they are inflating this in order to win over the of the media and gain the world's sympathy. The worst crimes in history were committed against the Jews, yet these crimes are no worse than what the Jews are doing in Palestine. What was done to the Jews was a crime, but isn't what the Jews are doing today in the land of Palestine not a crime?!
Look at modern history. Where has Great Britain gone? Where has Czarist Russia gone? Where has France gone - France, which almost ruled the entire world? Where is Nazi Germany, which massacred millions and ruled the world? Where did all these superpowers go? He who made them disappear will make America disappear too, God willing. He who made Russia disappear overnight is capable of making America disappear and fall, Allah willing.
We have ruled the world before, and by Allah, the day will come when we will rule the entire world again. The day will come when we will rule America. The day will come when we will rule Britain and the entire world – except for the Jews. The Jews will not enjoy a life of tranquility under our rule, because they are treacherous by nature, as they have been throughout history. The day will come when everything will be relieved of the Jews - even the stones and trees which were harmed by them. Listen to the Prophet Muhammad, who tells you about the evil end that awaits Jews. The stones and trees will want the Muslims to finish off every Jew.

When showing what Abu Hamza said, it still shows the same thing for the context. Guess what Mrislamanswersback? Everyone knows about the violent jihad and the Islamist worldview preached by Abu Hamza, which was why the British supported the MAB [Muslim Association of Britain] to capture the Findsbury mosque based on the false assumption that the MAB are moderate Muslims. This is the full context of what Abu Hamza said:

What makes Allah happy? Allah’s happy when (non-Muslims) get killed.”


You see the Islamic rule, if a Kuffar (non-Muslims) goes into a Muslim country. And he’s walking by. He’s like a cow; boy, anybody could take him. That is the Islamic rule and this is the opinion of Islam. It’s not my opinion. If you read the books of jihad, you’ll see . . . A Kuffar is walking by, he walks inside – you catch him. “What are you doing here?” Then he’s a booty, you can sell him in the market. If Muslims cannot take him, you know, and sell him in the market then you just kill him. It’s okay.


It’s only a matter of time until we rule Earth, until we control Earth.

 

It is the same for an unidentifie ddemonstrator as he said:

One day this very flag will fly over the Parliament in London. We will see this flag that will fly over the White House, and we will see the Black House, the Kaaba [in Mecca] will take over the whole world!

Yet he also doesn't mention about Islam becoming the dominant way because more people convert to Islam, even though it still has the same thing as the "full context." Yes, not all Islamists use terrorism [though they still support terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah] and some do use conversion to help impose their backward form of Islam, but they still use the language that make the violent jihadists seem heroic, even to the ones who they succeeded in converting to Islam, while pretending to be moderate to the non-Arab and non-Islamic world, with their condemnations of terrorism being weak. Are there are peaceful Muslims who want to coexist with the fre eworld? Yes, they are. But I'm not talking about them. 

Though Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, it is not near to being the dominant way in the non-Muslims world. Mrislamanswersback claims that the Koran does say that Islam will be the dominant way, not by violence, but by the spreading of it. He uses reports that it is the fastest growing religion to whitewash these Islamists. 

Mrislamnaswersback says it's the context of what Allah says, but he can't determine if it's the context of what those Islamists said because "they were quick sound-bites," even though they never mentioned what Mrislamanswersback mentions. He can't ge thimself to admit that they really are calling for world domination.  

Instead, according to Mrialmanswersback, it is fear mongeirng by John Hagee and Christian fundamentalists [MrIslamanswersback does show Shoebat's interview with Hagee and that interview is what Mrislamanswersback is talking about], even though anyone with eyes can see that it's not fear mongering, but just part of the proof that Islamism is a global threat.  Mrislamanswersback claims that they're people "on the other side" the so-called white anglo Americans out there to take over the world. This is the pot calling the kettle black because Mrislamanswersback takes them out of context. 

I just finished I of my refutation. Part II is coming soon. 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »