About Me

Name: Benyamin Solomon
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Mrislamanswersback Exposed and Refuted Part II

This is part II of  my refutation of this anti-American propagandist from youtube.

By Benyamin Solomon

In part I of this article [also see here on my blog], I debunked his claim about these white anglo Americans and westerners who supposedly seek world domination. Mrislamanswersback complains about America and the west spreading democracy as part of a white-anglo western attempt to dominate the world. Mrislamanswersback said,"This has been the goal of the radical anglo European and American, to dominate the world. Make no mistakes about it.  This has been their goal. History proves it. And today, the obstacle that stands in the way of them achieving this goal is Islam and the Muslim people. This is why today, Islam is being demonized. This is why today, the Muslim areas are being targeted. This is why today they're trying to pass policies in order to promote some idea or force or impose the idea of a western-style democracy in the Middle East. You've continually heard them talk about democracy. They want to change it. They want to change it. They want to shape the Middle East. This is their goal. This is their goal-to dominate and they're the ones who are really trying to change the culture of the Middle East and other peoples around the face of the Earth. So make no mistake about it. The true peoples who's intent to control the world is them, not the Muslim[s]. It is they, the radical anglo American and European. These are the people, who's goal is global domination."

At the end of that video, they show the same clip of conspiracy theorist Antony J. Hidler. In the last article, I already showed some of the proof about the Islamist's goal of world domination and debunked the claim that these so-called radical anglo westerners seek world domination. Anyway, let's continue with ridiculous claims made by Mrislamanswersback. Here's some really amusing irony. Mrislamanswersbacksays his vidoes are a "Truth destroys Falsehood production," yet these articles will destroy Mrislamansersback's falsehoods. 

Mrislamanswersback, if these white anglo-Europeans and Americans seek world domination, then why do they want to spread democracy? With democracy, they can elect leaders who fight them. If they seek world domination, they would take it over [or possibly install puppet leaders], but they wouldn't seek to spread democracy.  Democracy is the best system. The Middle East is full of brutal totalitarian leaders. 

Mrislamanswersback and Walid Shoebat

   Walid Shoebat is a former PLO terrorist and now an evengelical christian and a supporter of Israel. As a secular Jew, I disagree with his Enengelical Christian positions. I disagree with what he says about Islam. Trying to "prove" that walid Shoebat is a fraud is an obsession of Mrislamanswersback. 

In this video [Walid Shoebat exposed and refuted 1 of 9], he claims that Shoebat is an alias, then contradicts himself with claiming that Walid Shoebat is not an alias and that it is just claimed by him that it is one. In the former video, Mrislamanswersback cites two articles where Shoebat's tour manager claims that he wants Shoebat to hide his armageddon christian evengelical beliefs, despite the fact that Shoebat's beliefs on that are well-known. According to those articles mentioned, Davies says that he want Shoebat to go aorund supposedly spreading anti-Muslim propaganda [despite the fact that Shoebat publicly hires Afghan Muslims] and not to tell anyone. It's suspicious why he would say these things, but fair enough. Mrislamanswersback does show the excerpts from the articles. They're meaningless. As stated, Shoebat is public with his  evangelical Christian beliefs and what he says about Islam, two of which I don't support. That doesn't prove that he's a fraud. Yes, I disagree with his evangelical Christian beliefs. But still, it doesn't prove that Shoebat is a fraud. Possibly [I'm not saying it's true], Davies could be using Shoebat, who believes these things and who actually was a former terrorist. This is inadequate evidence. Yet despite that even me [not associated with the Shoebat foundation] hears his evangelical beliefs and what he says on Islam, Mrislamanswersback claims that ''When shoebat goes out, he has to leave those parts out." 

Yet even before showing these two bunk sources [wasting the viewers time about Shoebat being an evangelical Christian when you could hear it just as easily off of him], Mrislamanswersback states:

Now, in dealing with Walid Shoebat, I've done some research and as far as I could find,  there is no proof that he was a former terrorist. There is no independent confirmation that this man was a terrorist. The only person who says he was a terrorist is himself or was a terrorist is himself. There is no independent proof outside of his own statements that he was part of the PLO or any other group that has been associated or alleged to be connected with terrorism. So based on that, we have to even question that right there. 

Mrislamanswersback has done some research and now manipulates his sources to "prove" him as a fraud or liar. Mrislamamanaswersback's "research" seems to exclude that Walid Shoebat showed hard evidence to Daniel Pipes about him being a Palestinian. As for being a terrorist, after seeing the documentation of him being from the territories, Daniel Pipes just trusted that he was a terrorist. Daniel Pipes said:

(1) Mr. Shoebat showed me a number of documents in several languages - official papers, newspaper clippings, and the like. I read them when he visited me but did not keep copies.
(2) He admits that he can document his life but not his having been a near-terrorist. He asks that that be taken on faith, given that the rest of his life is as he says it is. I see no reason to doubt him.

This is part of the proof that Mrislamanswersback's "research" is bunk. In part III, I will discuss more about Mrislamanswersback and his pathetic attempt to slander Mr. Shoebat. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive